The University of Calgary and the Universities Act: Telling the Story of Purposiveness
AbstractDeparting from a conventional account of the history and events that culminated in the establishment of the University of Calgary, the author provides a purposive approach to the 1966 Universities Act. The author argues that as an enabling statute, the Act is an unfinishable legal fact. It exists as a framework to coordinate action to serve the public interest. As such, it calls for a complex purposive interpretation rooted in the theoretical underpinnings of moral legalism. Drawing on Dworkin's notion of interpretive integrity, the author demonstrates how ambiguities on the face of the Act can best be resolved by applying the principles of inclusive and pure integrity. The author's analysis reveals that the University of Calgary professoriat does not merely constitute a group of "scholarly servants", but rather a "company of scholars".
Author(s) retain original copyright in the substantive content of the titled work, subject to the following rights that are granted indefinitely:
- Author(s) grant the Alberta Law Review permission to produce, publish, disseminate, and distribute the titled work in electronic format to online database services, including, but not limited to: LexisNexis, QuickLaw, HeinOnline, and EBSCO;
- Author(s) grant the Alberta Law Review permission to post the titled work on the Alberta Law Review website and/or related websites.
- Author(s) agree that the titled work may be used for educational or instructional purposes and/or in educational or instructional materials. The author(s) acknowledge that the titled work is subject to other such "fair dealing" provisions and applicable legislation.
- Author(s) grant a limited license to those accessing the titled work from an electronic database or an Alberta Law Review website to download the titled work onto their computer and to print a copy for their own personal, non-commercial use, subject to proper attribution.
To use the journal's content elsewhere, permission must be obtained from the author(s) and the Alberta Law Review.