The Accidental Consistency: Extracting a Coherent Principle from the Jurisprudence Surrounding Solicitor Client Privilege between the Police and the Crown
AbstractThe development of a clear and consistent approach to solicitor client privilege between the police and the Crown has met with significant difficulty. The author client argues, however, that despite a lack of apparent clarity in both jurisprudence and legislation, a closer examination reveals that a type of "accidental consistency" has developed, whereby the police can maintain privileged communication with Crown counsel, provided they remain at arms length from actual prosecution in an advisory capacity only. The author then calls for this "accidental consistency " to become more clearly codified in future jurisprudence and argues that the optimum model to ensure the maintenance of privilege would be the use of independent, in-house counsel by the police.
Author(s) retain original copyright in the substantive content of the titled work, subject to the following rights that are granted indefinitely:
- Author(s) grant the Alberta Law Review permission to produce, publish, disseminate, and distribute the titled work in electronic format to online database services, including, but not limited to: LexisNexis, QuickLaw, HeinOnline, and EBSCO;
- Author(s) grant the Alberta Law Review permission to post the titled work on the Alberta Law Review website and/or related websites.
- Author(s) agree that the titled work may be used for educational or instructional purposes and/or in educational or instructional materials. The author(s) acknowledge that the titled work is subject to other such "fair dealing" provisions and applicable legislation.
- Author(s) grant a limited license to those accessing the titled work from an electronic database or an Alberta Law Review website to download the titled work onto their computer and to print a copy for their own personal, non-commercial use, subject to proper attribution.
To use the journal's content elsewhere, permission must be obtained from the author(s) and the Alberta Law Review.