Loyalty and Distinctiveness: A New Approach to the Crown's Fiduciary Duty toward Aboriginal Peoples
AbstractAs a tool to protect the distinctive elements of Aboriginal cultures, the Supreme Court's current approach to s. 35 of the Charter has significant limitations. The judgments of the majority and of the minority in R. v. Mitchell illustrate these limitations, but also hint at the possibility of a fuller, more coherent protection of Aboriginal rights. This article argues that the Court should recognize that the Crown has a fiduciary duty to negotiate in good faith a "protected space" for those Aboriginal institutions necessary for cultural survival.
Author(s) retain original copyright in the substantive content of the titled work, subject to the following rights that are granted indefinitely:
- Author(s) grant the Alberta Law Review permission to produce, publish, disseminate, and distribute the titled work in electronic format to online database services, including, but not limited to: LexisNexis, QuickLaw, HeinOnline, and EBSCO;
- Author(s) grant the Alberta Law Review permission to post the titled work on the Alberta Law Review website and/or related websites.
- Author(s) agree that the titled work may be used for educational or instructional purposes and/or in educational or instructional materials. The author(s) acknowledge that the titled work is subject to other such "fair dealing" provisions and applicable legislation.
- Author(s) grant a limited license to those accessing the titled work from an electronic database or an Alberta Law Review website to download the titled work onto their computer and to print a copy for their own personal, non-commercial use, subject to proper attribution.
To use the journal's content elsewhere, permission must be obtained from the author(s) and the Alberta Law Review.