Searching for Truth but Missing the Point
AbstractThis article explores the shift from the traditional conceptualization of a criminal trial as an independent testing of facts to the standard of proof beyond a reasonable doubt, to a more recent view of the trial as a search for the truth. perception The authors contend that the "search for truth " approach imports two major flaws into the judicial process. First, it is impossible for a trier off act to actually know the truth; and second, because the concept has never been judicially defined, its use allows courts to justify whatever policy decision is being made. The authors conclude that the traditional view remains the better view, because the fundamental point of a criminal trial is not to determine what is true, but rather to determine whether the accused is guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.
Author(s) retain original copyright in the substantive content of the titled work, subject to the following rights that are granted indefinitely:
- Author(s) grant the Alberta Law Review permission to produce, publish, disseminate, and distribute the titled work in electronic format to online database services, including, but not limited to: LexisNexis, QuickLaw, HeinOnline, and EBSCO;
- Author(s) grant the Alberta Law Review permission to post the titled work on the Alberta Law Review website and/or related websites.
- Author(s) agree that the titled work may be used for educational or instructional purposes and/or in educational or instructional materials. The author(s) acknowledge that the titled work is subject to other such "fair dealing" provisions and applicable legislation.
- Author(s) grant a limited license to those accessing the titled work from an electronic database or an Alberta Law Review website to download the titled work onto their computer and to print a copy for their own personal, non-commercial use, subject to proper attribution.
To use the journal's content elsewhere, permission must be obtained from the author(s) and the Alberta Law Review.