A Comparison of the Spanish and Canadian Law of Self-Defence

  • Javier Valls Prieto
  • Wayne N. Renke

Abstract

In this article, the rules for self-defence in Canada and Spain are compared and contrasted. We will offer an explanation for the recognition of self-defence, in its several forms; describe some formal similarities and differences between the two versions of the defence; and then compare and contrast the approaches of the defence under eight main themes — interests protected; threats to those interests; mistakes by the defender; time constraints on the defence; measuring conduct falling within the scope of statutory protection; the availability of the defence to a defender who provoked aggression; and the use of evidence that does not fully support the defence.
Published
2010-06-01
How to Cite
Prieto, J. V., & Renke, W. N. (2010). A Comparison of the Spanish and Canadian Law of Self-Defence. Alberta Law Review, 47(4), 853. https://doi.org/10.29173/alr172
Section
Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>