Promoting Transparency While Protecting Privacy in Open Government in Canada
The pressure towards open data and proactive disclosure by government in Canada has created a renewed need to balance the competing values of transparency and privacy. This article addresses issues such as what constitutes personal information and therefore engages privacy concerns, and whether transparency goals are actually met by disclosure in every case. The decision of the Supreme Court of Canada in Ontario (Community Safety and Correctional Services) v. Ontario (Information and Privacy Commissioner) addressed these types of issues in the access to information context and so offers some important insights. Finally, this article proposes some guiding principles to assist in striking a balance between transparency and privacy.
Author(s) retain original copyright in the substantive content of the titled work, subject to the following rights that are granted indefinitely:
- Author(s) grant the Alberta Law Review permission to produce, publish, disseminate, and distribute the titled work in electronic format to online database services, including, but not limited to: LexisNexis, QuickLaw, HeinOnline, and EBSCO;
- Author(s) grant the Alberta Law Review permission to post the titled work on the Alberta Law Review website and/or related websites.
- Author(s) agree that the titled work may be used for educational or instructional purposes and/or in educational or instructional materials. The author(s) acknowledge that the titled work is subject to other such "fair dealing" provisions and applicable legislation.
- Author(s) grant a limited license to those accessing the titled work from an electronic database or an Alberta Law Review website to download the titled work onto their computer and to print a copy for their own personal, non-commercial use, subject to proper attribution.
To use the journal's content elsewhere, permission must be obtained from the author(s) and the Alberta Law Review.