Alberta Law Review, Vol 46, No 4

Beyond Lawfare: Juridical Oversight of Western Militaries

Christopher Waters

Abstract


While civilian supremacy over the armed forces is accepted as a matter of faith in Western countries, this supremacy often means little more than supremacy of the executive branch of government over top generals. Indeed, efforts to regulate armed forces through broader domestic or international legal frameworks, including international criminal law, have been resisted in some military quarters (particularly in the United Kingdom and the United States) with the military and its backers raising concerns of “legal encirclement” or “lawfare.” The author argues for broad civilian and democratic oversight of armed forces, including through increased judicial and quasi-judicial scrutiny of overseas military actions at the domestic and international levels. The author concludes that broad democratic oversight not only promotes compliance with international legal norms but supports operational effectiveness as well.

Full Text: Untitled
Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access
Font Size:  Small  Medium  Large





© 2010 Alberta Law Review

Email: info@albertalawreview.com

c/o Faculty of Law
University of Alberta
Edmonton, AB T6G 2H5
Canada

Home

Subscribe

Advertise

Current Issue
Past Issues Online
Backorder Print Issues
Submission Requirements

Online Supplement

Morrow Essay Contest
Prizes
Previous Winners
About the Alberta Law Review
Editorial Board
Previous Editors
Join the ALR
History of the ALR
W.A. Stevenson House
Patrons of the ALR