Alberta Law Review, Vol 49, No 1

The Case for Comprehensive Random Breath Testing Programs in Canada: Reviewing the Evidence and Challenges

Robert Solomon, Erika Chamberlain, Maria Abdoullaeva, Ben Tinholt, Suzie Chiodo

Abstract


Impairment related crashes remain Canada’s leading criminal cause of death. In response, this article examines impaired driving rates and enforcement in Canada and argues that random breath testing programs would increase the risk of apprehension, thereby enhancing the deterrent impact of Canada’s impaired driving laws. The authors analyze the international experience with random breath testing, explaining that most developed and developing countries, including Australia, New Zealand, and Ireland have implemented random breath testing. These programs have had significant traffic safety benefits and enjoy broad public support.

The authors argue that, while random breath testing legislation may be found to infringe section 8 and is most likely to infringe sections 9 and 10(b) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, it should be upheld under section 1. They argue that the potential benefits of random breath testing in Canada would be substantial, while the effects on individual rights would be modest.


Full Text: PDF
Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access
Font Size:  Small  Medium  Large





© 2010 Alberta Law Review

Email: info@albertalawreview.com

c/o Faculty of Law
University of Alberta
Edmonton, AB T6G 2H5
Canada

Home

Subscribe

Advertise

Current Issue
Past Issues Online
Backorder Print Issues
Submission Requirements

Online Supplement

Morrow Essay Contest
Prizes
Previous Winners
About the Alberta Law Review
Editorial Board
Previous Editors
Join the ALR
History of the ALR
W.A. Stevenson House
Patrons of the ALR