Police Use of Conducted Energy Weapons: A Review of the Canadian Jurisprudence

Authors

  • Vladimir A. Zaychenko PhD (Law), Samara State University; PhD Candidate (Criminology), School of Criminology, Simon Fraser University.
  • Simon N. Verdun-Jones JSD, Professor, School of Criminology, Simon Fraser University.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29173/alr129

Abstract

This article analyzes the current Canadian legal framework that governs the deployment of conducted energy weapons (CEWs), such as tasers, and explores the ongoing public debate concerning its use in Canada. The tragic case of Robert Dziekanski’s death at the Vancouver International Airport raised concerns about the use of CEWs and triggered important changes in the CEW policies across Canada. Both the Kennedy and Braidwood Commission Reports have led to restrictions on the use of CEWs. In light of these reports, this article provides some insight into the nature and scope of criminal and civil litigation involving police use of the CEW. It highlights the perception of the CEW as a weapon reserved for use only in the absence of other less forceful options. This article also identifies the various grounds for bringing criminal charges and/or civil suits against individual officers, local governments, and manufacturers.

Downloads

Issue

Vol 49, No 1

Section

Articles

License

For Editions following and including Volume 61 No. 1, the following applies.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 License

For Editions prior to Volume 61 No. 1, the following applies.

Author(s) retain original copyright in the substantive content of the titled work, subject to the following rights that are granted indefinitely:

  1. Author(s) grant the Alberta Law Review permission to produce, publish, disseminate, and distribute the titled work in electronic format to online database services, including, but not limited to: LexisNexis, QuickLaw, HeinOnline, and EBSCO;
  2. Author(s) grant the Alberta Law Review permission to post the titled work on the Alberta Law Review website and/or related websites.
  3. Author(s) agree that the titled work may be used for educational or instructional purposes and/or in educational or instructional materials. The author(s) acknowledge that the titled work is subject to other such "fair dealing" provisions and applicable legislation.
  4. Author(s) grant a limited license to those accessing the titled work from an electronic database or an Alberta Law Review website to download the titled work onto their computer and to print a copy for their own personal, non-commercial use, subject to proper attribution.

To use the journal's content elsewhere, permission must be obtained from the author(s) and the Alberta Law Review.