Professional Competence Peer Review and Quality Assurance in England and Wales and in Scotland
AbstractPeer review has emerged as a method of assessing the work of legal aid lawyers in the United Kingdom. The authors show how testing different methods led to review of files emerging as the most effective means of peer review. A number of approaches, including double marking of files, are used to ensure accuracy and consistency among the reviewers. Peer review in Scotland may be more relevant than England and Wales to the Canadian context as the legal professions are of similar size. The authors discuss both criminal and civil work and the application of peer review as well as the outcomes of the pilot projects in the U.K.
Author(s) retain original copyright in the substantive content of the titled work, subject to the following rights that are granted indefinitely:
- Author(s) grant the Alberta Law Review permission to produce, publish, disseminate, and distribute the titled work in electronic format to online database services, including, but not limited to: LexisNexis, QuickLaw, HeinOnline, and EBSCO;
- Author(s) grant the Alberta Law Review permission to post the titled work on the Alberta Law Review website and/or related websites.
- Author(s) agree that the titled work may be used for educational or instructional purposes and/or in educational or instructional materials. The author(s) acknowledge that the titled work is subject to other such "fair dealing" provisions and applicable legislation.
- Author(s) grant a limited license to those accessing the titled work from an electronic database or an Alberta Law Review website to download the titled work onto their computer and to print a copy for their own personal, non-commercial use, subject to proper attribution.
To use the journal's content elsewhere, permission must be obtained from the author(s) and the Alberta Law Review.